Browsing by Author "Hasan, Nabi"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Global Retracted Research Publications: A Bibliometric Study
    (INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar, 2022-11) Garg, Mohit; Hasan, Nabi
    The present study used a bibliometric technique to draw the patterns in retracted publications over time. A sample of bibliographic data of 12876 documents up to the year 2021 was extracted from the Scopus database. The analysis found that the number of retracted documents has significantly increased in the last decade, with most documents in 2010 (4377) followed by 2011 (3534). The study found that most retracted documents were from China, followed by the United States and India. The highest number of 70 retracted documents were from the author Nazari, A. of Islamic Azad University, Iran, with a rate of 4.04 retractions per total document published. The other authors were Ueshima, H. (68), Otake, H. (45), Sato, Y. (45), and Iwamoto, J. (41) from Japanese Institutions. The highest rate of retraction per total documents were of Ghoranneviss, M., Islamic Azad University, Iran (24.65), followed by Boldt, J., Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (24.04), and Shamshirband, S. National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan (18.54). The majority of the source type was found to be Conference Proceedings (11096, 60.71%), followed by Journal Publications (7159, 39.17%). The study found the maximum number of retracted publications were in the Conference Proceedings (11096, 60.71%), followed by Journals (7159, 39.17%).
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Landscape of Metadata Schemas for Research Data Repositories: FAIRsharing Analysis
    (INFLIBNET Centre, Gandhinagar, 2023-11-17) T R, Manu; Hasan, Nabi
    Research data is the recorded information generated while conducting research, writing an article, theses and dissertations, and other research processes. Providing access to research data is a challenge for all stakeholders in the research community. Metadata schemas contain metadata properties describing a research data repository, such as general scope, content, infrastructure, technical, quality, and metadata standards. Several metadata schemas are available for describing the research data repository. However, to facilitate the selection of an appropriate metadata standard for the research repository, the RDA Metadata Standards Directory, re3data.org, and FAIRsharing have compiled a list of metadata schemas in a single platform. FAIRsharing is a curated platform for information and education resources on data and metadata standards, inter-related to databases and data policies. Therefore, researchers preferred FAIRsharing to undertake a study on the assessment of the landscape of metadata schemas indexed by the platform with objectives of identifying the list of metadata schemas, studying their growth and development, distinguishing the disciplinary metadata schemas, identifying the country-wise contributions, organizations, funding and government bodies and institutional contributions in developing and actively maintaining metadata schemas, etc. The result found that FAIRsharing has covered over 1600 metadata schemas covering all the major domains of science and technology, medicine, management, arts & humanities, and social science. It has overwhelming organizations to maintain and fund developing the metadata schemas. The maximum of the metadata schemas is attributed by the Creative Commons attribution, GNU General Public License, Open Data Commons Attributions, etc. Overall, the study found it worthy for data curators, metadata creators, data repository developers, policymakers, research data librarians, etc., to select the appropriate metadata schema for the research data repository.